Apple iTunes
 
emil kazaz and the eternal symbols
commentary by peter quinones
published 21 february 2008
 
special assignment | volume 1 number 12
 
"Every human is an artist. And this is the main art that we have: the creation of our story." -Don Miguel Ruiz
 
published since May 2006 | Special Assignment is a series of artists' profiles, events spotlights, and interviews.
 
 
Peter Quinones (eMailWeb site), a resident of Brooklyn, New York, is currently working on a book about contemporary literature and its relationship to the culture as a whole. Several notable authors, interviewed by Peter for The Bohemian Aesthetic, are assisting him with that project.
 
 
Born 14 January 1953, in Gyumri, Armenia, Emil Kazaz was trained as an artist in the traditional academy style. At age seven, he studied sculpture at the local art school, then attended the Mercurov Art School when he was 12. After moving to Yerevan, the capital of Armenia, he continued his studies at the Terlemezian Art College, which he finished in 1972, and the University of Fine Arts and Theater, from which he graduated in 1978 with honors. He settled in Los Angeles in 1980. His CV since then reads like any aspiring artist's dream come true: a steady stream of exhibitions in Europe, Asia, Russia, North and South America, Canada, and throughout the United States, along with international critical recognition, including the prestigious Lorenzo Medici medal from the Florence Biennale in 2003 and Grande Lorenzo il Magnifico (Medici) Prize in Sculpture from Florence Biennale 2007. Emil Kazaz lives and continues to work in Los Angeles, California.
 
 
 

 
 
Advanced Notions (various)
formerly patsymooreDOTcoms Bonus Writings; insightful and inciting literature from artists and about art
 
Amsterdam Dispatch (Karin Bos)
an insider's look at the art scene and artist life in Amsterdam
 
The Art of Fiction (Peter Quinones)
reviews of timeless literature
author interviews
 
bohoTV (various)
noteworthy Arts-centric viral video
 
Cambridge Letters (Kym Cooper-Rodgers)
reports about art scenes abroad
(9/2004-12/2005)
 
Deleted Scenes (Stuart Chait)
a guide to the great cinema and television you're missing
 
Design Psychology (Jeanette Joy Fisher)
a look at how design elements contribute to happiness, well-being, and productivity
(7/2005-3/2007)
 
The Iraq Watch Papers (various)
observations on war and peace
(3/2003-7/2006)
 
Lessons in Creativity (Linda Dessau)
self-care tips for artists
 
London Letters (Shakila Taranum Maan)
reports about the London arts scene and design
 
On Books (Tim Haigh)
book criticism
 
Paris: Vie et Art (Francis Powell)
an insider's look at the art scene and artist life in The City of Light
 
Portrait of the Artist (various)
a gallery of work by compelling visualists
 
Rake on Music (Jamie Lee Rake)
your map to the music underground
 
Savor (Brian Parker)
a passionate survey of food and cooking
 
The Self Expressed (various)
creative writing
 
Special Assignment (various)
profiles and interviews
 
Tending the Planet (Alyssa Stebbing)
ruminations on social responsibility and spiritual life
 
Thus Spake Fred (Fred Clark)
smart, witty examinations of socio-political issues
 
transcripts from A Lovers Quarrel
(Dwight Ozard)
one man's documentation of his restless relationship with faith and culture
(6/2004-9/2005)
 
Verse (Jim Newcombe/John-Paul Gillespie)
poetry laid bare
 
Verse Live (various)
new poetry
 
The World Watch Papers (various)
inspections of matters impacting the globe
 
Write of Passage (Eboni Rafus)
journalings of a confirmed writer

Art can be a confounding thing, and the general scene loosely lobbed under the broad category of 'Modern Art' is often enraging and mystifying. A lot of it can seem like so much hype, noise, and fraud. We think of Duchamp's toilet bowl, Jeff Koons' basketballs, Burden's infamous "Garçon!" cream pitcher, or even Barnett Newman's large canvases painted a single solid color, and it's very easy to get the feeling that we're being had. (I suspect this very feeling is what turns many otherwise interested people off of Modern Art.) In my opinion, a big drawback is that art of this sort is too 'now', too easily identified with this time, this place, this age. It's, therefore, refreshing to come across work that can't be pinned down in such a manner, that's completely indifferent to the present; work that deals in types or archetypes. The creations of the Armenian-born, Los Angeles-based painter and sculptor Emil Kazaz seem, to me, to be just that. Indeed, in studying Kazaz' art (either his paintings or sculptures) it's impossible to say if it was created in 2007 or 1607; there are no social, historical, or epochal references of any kind. Everything is pulled out of the eternal, the atemporal—what Carl Jung termed 'the collective unconscious'.


Joseph L. Henderson, in the "Ancient Myths and Modern Man" chapter of Jung's anthology, Man and His Symbols, identifies several kinds of myths which have repeatedly surfaced in civilizations and cultures throughout time, and, arguably, the most primal and universal of these is The Myth of the Hero. It should be kept in mind that this myth is only one of the Eternal Symbols, and that a lot of Kazaz' work takes up many of the others. (Further uncovering of this would be a most worthy project for the serious student.)


The 1995 Kazaz sculpture "Judith" references the familiar (deuterocanonical) Biblical account of the beautiful Jewish widow Judith holding the severed head of Holofernes.

 
 
 
 

This scene has been depicted a number of times in Western art; among the most notable examples are paintings by Allori, Michelangelo, Caravaggio, Klimt and—perhaps the most famous of all—Artemisia Gentileschi. To make a long story quite short, in hero myths, the hero kills the monster. In the Book of Judith, Holofernes is a general in the army that has landed Judith and her countrymen in captivity. She seduces Holofernes (in promise only), gains his confidence, is admitted to his tent, gets him sloshing drunk, and cuts off his head, causing the occupying army to flee. It goes without saying that Judith is the hero, Holofernes the monster. Henderson writes:


The myth of the hero is the most common and the best known myth in the world.
 
We find it in the classical mythology of Greece and Rome, in the Middle Ages, in the Far East, and among contemporary primitive tribes. It also appears in our dreams.
 
It has an obvious dramatic appeal, and a less obvious—but nonetheless profound—psychological importance.


I don't propose, here, to give any type of detailed critical analysis of Kazaz' works. Rather, I offer my humble interpretation of their meanings, and I invite readers to compare well-known portrayals of this Biblical story by other great artists with Kazaz' sculpture, in order to arrive at a sense of how different artists achieve different perspective. Here are some examples:

 
 
Judith with the Head of Holophernes
by Cristofano Allori, 1631
(Royal Collection, London)
Judith Beheading Holofernes
by Caravaggio
Judith Carries Away the Head of Holofernes
by Michelangelo
 
Judith Slaying Holofernes
by Artemisia Gentileschi
Judith I
by Gustav Klimt
 
 
Another clear hero myth is that of Michael the Archangel. In Jewish and Christian writings, Michael (or St. Michael, the Archangel) is generally represented as the Field Commander of the Army of God; he's pictured throughout the ages of Western civilization as having defeated Satan in battle. Below are a few examples of that scene, including one by Emil Kazaz, from 1994:
 
 
St. Michael's Victory Over the Devil
by Sir Jacob Epstein
(near the entrance to
Coventry Cathedral)
St. Michael's Victory Over the Devil
(sculpture above the main entrance to St. Michael's in Hamburg, Germany)
Fontaine Saint-Michel
(Paris, France)
Michael, the Archangel
(The Sopo Archangels collection)
The archangel Michael tramples Satan
artist: Guido Reni
(Capuchin Church of Santa Maria della Concezione, Rome)
Turamichele (Tower Michele)
(Augsberg, Germany)
 
 
I think it's quite clear, from these comparisons, that Kazaz' vision, while similar in some respects, is markedly different in others. (Of course, this is always true of the greatest art: it's simultaneously familiar and unfamiliar ). I leave it to more accomplished and discerning critics to comment directly on the works, confident that few would miss the almost unbelieveable force and power of Emil Kazaz' sculpture and the supreme execution of his vision. I believe that his engagement with the Eternal Symbols is one of the most fascinating things happening in art today.
 
 
INTERVIEW
   
PETER
QUINONES:

You recently had great success with your sculptures at the Biennale Internazionale Dell'Arte Contemporanea in Florence, Italy. Can you tell us what that was like?

   
EMIL KAZAZ:
It does feel like victory.
   
PQ:

Please tell us a bit about the works you exhibited at the Biennale.

   
EK:
My work is visual art you must see and feel. Telling about the art is not the same as seeing it. Words do not allow [you to] visualize the image of art. Moreover, even the photos of the artworks do not do justice to the actual artworks.
   
PQ:
Who are some of your favorite artists or the greatest influences on your art? I ask because you don't seem to follow any school or movement in particular; your work is very unique.
   
EK:
Donatello, Titian, Velasques, El Greko, Michelangelo, and Bosch were my teachers. Influence would not be the right word to use, but [I] love to create while listening [to] Mozart or Bach.
   
PQ:
What are the central themes or messages of your art?
   
EK:
I am born for Art and I live for Art. What message? When the bee makes the honey, does it think about message? When the hen lays eggs, does it think about message? And when the pregnant woman bears a child, does she think about the message? Likewise, when I sculpt, paint or draw, I never think about any message. The message is what you see and understand.
   
PQ:
How does being a serious artist in the U.S. differ from the scene in Armenia or Europe?
   
EK:

Since it is extremely difficult to become a very serious artist in [the] U.S.A., it makes the serious artist stronger on the way of their hard endeavors than to become serious in a rather easy way. It is the same like in sports when the sportsman trains himself with heavy duty or with no coach to train him right.


Let's explore an example: Jasper Jones in [the] United States, Picasso in Europe, and Martiros Saryan in Armenia. They do have a lot similar and at the same time different. They are similar in making their dream come true; they have made their dreams. Although they are different with their point of view and valuing the life by their own values. It all depends on the philosophy of the artist wherever they come from.

   
PQ:
You also paint. What are some of the similarities and differences between painting and sculpture, for you? Let's say you have an idea, what determines if you paint it or sculpt?
   
EK:

The sculpture is three dimensional; when you want to feel and touch your ideas, then you sculpt. All my ideas are explored in both painting and sculpting, though they are two different medias [sic] and techniques to work with. Painting and sculpting both have their unique structure and their own advantages. It is like talking in different languages. Whenever you talk in different languages, you feel great about using them both.


Sculpture is an art of form with three dimensions and paining is art of colors. You can never be bored while talking two languages at the same time.

   
PQ:
Could we get your thoughts on one specific painting, say "Pios" of 1997?
   
EK:

Sure..."Love makes the dead alive, but the forbidden love is always sweeter."


Pop is the spiritual and sacred world and the figure of the woman is the earthy world. The image of sacred and earthy humankind is the magnetization of the two different worlds.

 
 

Emil Kazaz was awarded the prestigious Grande Lorenzo il Magnifico (Medici) Prize in Sculpture at the 2007 Florence Biennale.

Kazaz with Grande Lorenzo il Magnifico (Medici) Prize and his sculpture,
"The Cup of Moon"
Dr. Monet Airian of Airian Dome of Fine Art;
Piero Celona, Vice President of the
Florence Biennale 2207; and Kazaz
   
Airian and Kazaz, with Grande Lorenzo il Magnifico (Medici) Prize, next to "King's Toy" bronze sculpture
Eugenio Giani and Kazaz
 
 
  Emil Kazaz on YouTube | recent bronze sculptures; Self Portrait: Requiem for a Forgotten World
   
Emil Kazaz at LittleArmenia.com
 

Views expressed on this page may or may not be representative of The Bohemian Aesthetic or its founder. All materials appearing on this Web site are copyrights of patsymooreDOTcom, respective authors, or original sources.